
Given that at least two days are required for security arrangements and other preparations, the verdict is now expected sometime in April, as the court has yet to set a final ruling date on Yoon's Dec. 3 declaration of martial law.
Some expect the ruling could come as early as next week, but with by-elections scheduled for Wednesday to fill vacant posts in several cities and provinces, it seems unlikely that the court will make its decision early in the week, as it may want to avoid any political fallout.
However, many believe the verdict should be delivered before the retirement of two justices from the court's current eight-seat bench, which is just three weeks away.
Once justices Moon Hyung-bae and Lee Mi-sun step down after completing their six-year terms on April 18, the court will be left with just six justices. While a ruling would still be legally possible, concerns over the legitimacy of the decision may arise, making it likely that the court will seek to reach a conclusion before their departure.
Given these circumstances, legal experts anticipate that Yoon's ruling could be delivered by late next week or within the next two to three weeks.
As the court also handles general cases including constitutional petitions and other reviews, typically on Thursdays, with upcoming sessions possibly scheduled for April 10 or 17, Yoon's ruling is unlikely to be made on those dates.
A decision to uphold Yoon's impeachment would require at least six votes in favor, resulting in his immediate ouster from office and a snap presidential election within 60 days, which could take place in early or mid-June.

The main opposition Democratic Party (DP) called for the court to deliver Yoon's verdict swiftly, while also threatening to impeach Acting President Han Duck-soo once again, who was reinstated last Monday after being suspended about three months, unless he proceeds with appointing Ma Eun-hyuk, a nominee recommended by the party, to fill the vacancy on the highest court's bench, which currently has eight of the nine justices seated.
The ruling People Power Party (PPP) accused the Democratic Party (DP) of repeatedly abusing its parliamentary majority in a spree of moves to impeach key officials including Han who disagree with the party.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.